Revolutionary new knowledge technology • redefining AI
• Open source;
• Fundamentally different: Science is about researching fundamentals. However, the scientific approach to Artificial Intelligence has no proven foundation. So, in fact, the "scientific" approach to AI is not fundamental, and therefore not scientific. Thinknowlogy is fundamentally different. Literally;
• Proof: If the foundation of a scientific discipline is correct, it integrates all its sub-disciplines. However, the sub-disciplines of the scientific approach to Artificial Intelligence are incompatible, while Thinknowlogy integrates multiple sub-disciplines seamlessly;
• Example: Ontology (reasoning) and NLP are incompatible: Ontology is based on formal language and NLP is based on natural language. And therefore, science fails to integrate both to: reasoning in natural language;
• Results: Although in its infancy, Thinknowlogy has results with a depth that cannot be delivered by any scientific AI method, because only Thinknowlogy has a proven foundation in intelligence.
Not by evolution, but by fundamental design
According to science, intelligence should have been emerged by "itself" out of nothing. And natural language should have been evolved from the grunting sounds of cave men. But what if the evolution theory is nonsense? What if intelligence and natural language are designed by God? A designer always leaves "fingerprints" in the design, in the form of logic, structure, unity, etc.
Natural language is an expression of intelligence. So, grammar can be utilized as foundation for Artificial Intelligence:
• Grammar provides structure to a language;
• Structure is a result of logic;
• Logic is a result of intelligence.
Find that logic contained within grammar,
and it will provide the foundation for Artificial Intelligence through natural language.
Thinknowlogy currently only accepts sentences with a very limited grammar. After developing a fundamental basis, I will expand the grammar of this system.