top of page

Natural intelligence is the use of naturally occurring logic

This naturally occurring logic provides concrete clues for organizing natural objects, like:

  • Grouping objects that belong together,

  • Separating objects that don't belong together,

  • Archiving objects that have become less important.


Natural intelligence and spacial information are sources of natural intelligence:

  • Natural language is providing concrete logic for organizing knowledge objects,

  • Spatial information provides concrete logic for organizing spatial objects (utilized in, e.g., self-driving cars).


In this way, our brains know how to organize their knowledge and spatial information.

I focus on natural language because this source of natural intelligence is hardly understood by scientists. Hence, the inability of Large Language Models to organize changes in their knowledge independently.

​​​

Aristotle was the first to describe a natural reasoning construct, almost 2400 years ago:

  • Given: All philosophers are mortal.”

  • Given: Socrates is a philosopher.

  • Logical conclusion:Socrates is mortal.​

​

I have discovered more reasoning constructs, naturally found in the human language.

​​

The human language provides many simple reasoning constructs, which are, in fact, natural laws of intelligence. Together, these simple naturally occurring reasoning constructs form an extremely complex knowledge and understanding system, which we call: natural language.

​

I am implementing these naturally occurring reasoning constructs in software, which is published as open source. Thinknowlogy is the world's only naturally intelligent knowledge technology.

God's intelligent design of the human language

Science relies on the assumption that we live in an ordered universe that is subject to exact, deterministic, and consistent laws of nature. In search for the exact, deterministic, and consistent laws of nature involved with intelligence, I have discovered that natural intelligence is a set of naturally occurring logic, which is more advanced than the logic already described by scientists. I have identified the human language and spatial information as sources of natural intelligence. My focus is on language.

As a Christian, I believe that nature is designed intelligently. And I believe that, in principle, any intelligent design can be unraveled using reverse engineering. Using reverse engineering, I am replicating natural intelligence in software based on God's intelligent design of the human language, which I call the Laws of Intelligence that are naturally found in the Human Language. My automated reasoning system has results that scientists can't deliver because scientific theories are inadequate to define intelligence in a natural, consistent, and deterministic way.

Moreover, I have discovered that these naturally occurring reasoning constructs provide the human language with its self-organizing capabilities. By utilizing the self-organizing properties of language, my software — called Thinknowlogy — is the world's only self-organizing reasoning system.

Although many languages exist, God has designed the human language only once. This one design applies to all languages. I have configured the logic of my system for five languages: English, Spanish, French, Dutch, and Chinese, while scientific reasoning systems are limited to one language.

My software is published as open source. So, anyone with programming knowledge can explore how my system works.

Thinknowlogy in a nutshell

Parsing:

  • Thinknowlogy is a kind of Controlled Natural Language reasoner. It means that the grammar of the input as well as the output sentences are very limited. It only accepts sentences of which the meaning can be processed — whereas solutions accepting full sentences are unable to process the full meaning;

  • The definitions of this very limited grammar are found in sub folder: data\grammar\. They are described in a kind of Extended Backus-Naur Form (EBNF);

  • After a sentence is entered by the user, the sentence is mapped onto a fitting definition in the grammar file of the corresponding language. The definitions contain lexical categories like numbers, adjectives, conjunctions, nouns and proper nouns, which are crucial in advanced automated reasoning. In case a read word is unknown to the system, a new word is created in the system with the corresponding lexical category of the definition. This process works for any language, without the use of extensive words lists. Only a few basic words are defined in the grammar file;

  • After parsing, the sentence is stored in a complex — language-independent — knowledge structure — without losing any meaning. But the system also checks — the sentence entered against the current knowledge — for conflicts.


Reasoning:

  •  The reasoning system then performs all kinds of logical operations on the knowledge structure, such as drawing conclusions, making assumptions, and asking choice questions. These logical operations — which I call natural reasoning constructs — are similar to the one described by Aristotle, almost 2400 years ago:

    • Given: All philosophers are mortal.

    • Given: Socrates is a philosopher.

    • Logical conclusion: Socrates is mortal.

  • The simplest of these natural reasoning constructs are described in my Scientific Challenge. I defy anyone to implement their own system with similar results;

  • The system checks — and notifies the user — whether self-generated question are answered by the user, and whether self-generated knowledge has been confirmed by the user;

  • The implementation of the Laws of Intelligence that are naturally found in the Human Language provides the system with self-organizing properties: it groups what belongs together, and it separates what doesn't belong together, at a deeper level than can be achieved by semantic techniques;

  • During the reasoning process, a justification structure is constructed for every self-generated conclusion, assumption or question. It justifies the logical operations performed on the knowledge structure. This justification structure is kept up-to-date with each change. A justification report for the self-generated knowledge can be requested at any time. This justification structure results for example in a self-adjusting level of uncertainty for the self-generated assumptions. If the level of uncertainty of a self-generated assumption changes, the user will be notified.


Writing:

  • Once the reasoning process is completed, the changes of the knowledge structure are presented to the user, written as readable sentences;

  • The writing process follows the opposite path as the reading process, by mapping the changes of the knowledge structure onto the definitions in the grammar file, then constructing the sentences word-by-word according to the found grammar definition;

  • And because no meaning is lost during the storage and reasoning process, the written sentences have the same quality as the input sentences.


Fundamental science:
So, Thinknowlogy converts readable sentences to logic — and converts derived logic back to readable sentences — without losing meaning. And without human intervention, whereas many ‘scientific’ approaches require the hand of an expert to complete this circle:

  • from a readable sentence to natural logic,

  • and from derived logic back to readable sentences again.


This defines a fundamental science: If a natural phenomenon is scientifically understood, this natural phenomenon can have multiple appearances, like electromagnetism. Electromagnetism is scientifically understood, because we are able:

  • to convert light into electricity, and electricity back to light,

  • and to convert motion — via magnetism — into electricity, and electricity — via magnetism — back to motion.


Apparently, the logic of language — natural intelligence and natural language — is not scientifically understood. Hence, this Thinknowlogy project.

Advanced explanation

It is believed that natural intelligence has evolved over millions (or billions) of years through behavioral adaptations. As such, AI is mainly studied from the perspective of cognitive / behavioral science, which results in mimicry of behavior. But we all know that mimicking the behavior of a hen (chicken) does not produce eggs. So, AI is not naturally intelligent, and never will be.

As a Christian, I believe that intelligence is enshrined in the Laws of Nature. So, I am studing natural intelligence from the perspective of fundamental science — Logic and Laws of Nature —  because:

  • Autonomous reasoning requires both natural intelligence and natural language;

  • Intelligence and language are natural phenomena;

  • Natural phenomena obey the Laws of Nature;

  • Laws of Nature and logic are investigated using fundamental science.

​​

These Laws of Intelligence that are naturally found in the Human Language are demonstrated by:

  • Reasoning in natural language:

    • Drawing conclusions (more advanced than scientific solutions),

    • Making assumptions (with self-adjusting level of uncertainty),

    • Asking questions (about gaps in the knowledge),

    • Detecting confirmations, conflicts, and some cases of semantic ambiguity,

    • Displaying justification reports for the self-generated knowledge;

  • Multilingualism, proving: Natural languages have one common and logical origin.

​

Scientific challenge

My automated reasoning system has results that scientists can't deliver — under the same strict precondition — because scientific theories are inadequate to describe natural intelligence. Therefore, I defy anyone to beat the simplest results of my reasoner in a generic (=scientific) way, under the same strict preconditions as my system:

  • From readable sentences (with restricted grammar, Controlled Natural Language),
  • through natural logic (natural intelligence),

  • with the results expressed in readable, autonomously — word-by-word — constructed sentences,

  • in multiple languages (*),

  • without programmed or trained knowledge,

  • without human-written output sentences,

  • without extensive word lists,

  • published as — free of charge — open-source software, just like my software is published as open-source.

​

(*) Logic is (almost) language-independent. My natural reasoner therefore implements an (almost) language-independent logic, which is configured for five languages: English, Spanish, French, Dutch, and Chinese.

  • LinkedIn
  • Bluesky_Logo.svg

©2025 Menno Mafait

bottom of page