The Logic of Language

Science is concerned with natural phenomena that can be observed, replicated, tested, and potentially falsified. Belief, by contrast, deals with phenomena that are unobserved, untestable, non-replicable, or unfalsifiable.

The origins of the universe, life, taxonomic families, natural intelligence, and the human language have never been directly observed — let alone replicated, tested, or falsified. Consequently, claims about these origins are not scientific conclusions but belief systems — unless and until the phenomena themselves can be reproduced under controlled conditions and on an appropriate scale, if necessary.

Without such replication, these models remain outside the domain of verifiable science.
 

Some historical events cannot be replicated, while others can. It is braver to acknowledge that you cannot replicate the origin of energy, matter, the universe, life, and all kinds of life forms than to invent an elaborate belief system that also cannot do so, while imposing that fabricated belief system—namely philosophical naturalism—on society, including vulnerable youth.

Scientists should identify these historical events that cannot be replicated and attempt to replicate those that can. If scientists will not, I will:

Unlike other origins, the unrevealed properties of intelligence and language may be accessible to replication under controlled conditions—such as through software—particularly by examining the underlying laws of nature.

This document explores how natural intelligence and the human language can be replicated in software by identifying and applying the Laws of Intelligence naturally embedded in the Human Language.

​​

_____________________________​

Disclaimer: To scientists, natural intelligence may be synonymous with consciousness (and free will). This document is limited to the logic inherent in nature—particularly the logic inherent in human language.